You have exceeded your limit for simultaneous device logins.
Your current subscription allows you to be actively logged in on up to three (3) devices simultaneously. Click on continue below to log out of other sessions and log in on this device.
Editor Emeritus Roger Sutton was editor in chief of The Horn Book, Inc., from 1996-2021. He was previously editor of The Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books and a children's and young adult librarian. He received his MA in library science from the University of Chicago in 1982 and a BA from Pitzer College in 1978.
says
says
says
says
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the
article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has
been flagged, a staff member will investigate.
Comment should not
be empty !!!
Uma Krishnaswami
>Deposed, that's the word. It was driving me crazy. Interesting review, though.
Posted
: Mar 10, 2010 08:33
Comment
should not be empty !!!
Anonymous
>Burton's take on Alice will be no surprise to anyone who saw his Sleepy Hollow. For better and worse, here is a guy who likes to put his source material through the grinder, not who wants to do right by Washington, Carroll, Tenniel, or anyone else.
Posted
: Mar 10, 2010 04:32
Comment
should not be empty !!!
dkm
>Amen re: "prophesized," the nonsense use of usurp, and knowing in advance of a film's deviation from the story.
The cinematic deviation from Where the Wild Things Are, however, was hard to swallow.
dkm
Posted
: Mar 10, 2010 03:09
Comment
should not be empty !!!
Lyle Blake Smythers
>Thanks for the perceptive and interesting review. It is the second online review I have seen today, and they both use the term "prophesize," which of course is not a real word. It makes me wonder if the movie itself uses the word and if these reviewers are picking the neologism up from studio promotional materials. While I'm being a cranky old word coot, I might exhort your reviewer to look up "usurp," the meaning of which she does not appear to grasp accurately. Otherwise, well done. I find it possible to swallow great liberties taken with great works when I know about such deviations in advance.
Add Comment :-
Comment Policy:
Comment should not be empty !!!
Uma Krishnaswami
>Deposed, that's the word. It was driving me crazy. Interesting review, though.Posted : Mar 10, 2010 08:33
Anonymous
>Burton's take on Alice will be no surprise to anyone who saw his Sleepy Hollow. For better and worse, here is a guy who likes to put his source material through the grinder, not who wants to do right by Washington, Carroll, Tenniel, or anyone else.Posted : Mar 10, 2010 04:32
dkm
>Amen re: "prophesized," the nonsense use of usurp, and knowing in advance of a film's deviation from the story.The cinematic deviation from Where the Wild Things Are, however, was hard to swallow.
dkm
Posted : Mar 10, 2010 03:09
Lyle Blake Smythers
>Thanks for the perceptive and interesting review. It is the second online review I have seen today, and they both use the term "prophesize," which of course is not a real word. It makes me wonder if the movie itself uses the word and if these reviewers are picking the neologism up from studio promotional materials.While I'm being a cranky old word coot, I might exhort your reviewer to look up "usurp," the meaning of which she does not appear to grasp accurately.
Otherwise, well done. I find it possible to swallow great liberties taken with great works when I know about such deviations in advance.
Posted : Mar 09, 2010 10:48