A Perfect Day

Lane Smith’s A Perfect Day was released early this year (February) and is a book that has made an appearance on multiple Caldecott prediction lists throughout the year. It’s a story that, from a pedagogical point of view (I was trained as a school librarian, so I can’t help it), works well to demonstrate point of view. And it’s a story that will get child readers thinking about how our perspectives shape what we see and how we define the world — much like last year’s Caldecott Honor book They All Saw a Cat.

But Smith also subverts what could have been a one-note story about how various creatures define happiness into a tale of mischief and the food chain — and how those atop it sometimes determine the rules. (Is it a stretch to say this layer of dark humor gives the book a political relevance? Maybe. But it did cross my mind as I read it.)

If you haven’t seen it yet, let me summarize: sunny yellow endpapers and a big, warm sun open the book. We eventually see a house in the country. We meet Cat, happy in a bed of daffodils; Dog, wading in a tub of water; Chickadee, eating seed from the bird feeder; and Squirrel, despite not being able to get to the birdseed, finding a corncob in the grass. A boy named Bert is behind all of this, filling the tub with water for Dog, refilling the bird feeder, and dropping the corncob for Squirrel. It “was a perfect day” for each of these animals, we read as we meet each one.

It turns out that both grammar and font size are crucial in this book, given the turn the story takes in the form of Bear’s appearance. “It WAS a perfect day for Squirrel,” we suddenly read, the “was” enlarged and emboldened. Squirrel’s happiness is now very much in the past tense, as Bear barges in to take the corncob. (This is, thus far, my favorite picture book spread of 2017.) Bear also essentially takes away Chickadee’s, Dog’s, and Cat’s contentment by lumbering in and taking what he wants. The notion of a "perfect day" is a thing of the past for the now-hapless small creatures, having joined Bert inside the house on the final page to stare out the window in shock. Bear, in fact, is the one now having a perfect day.

All of this is accomplished with a very spare text. As I said, font size communicates much meaning here.

And so does the artwork. Frisky is a word that comes to mind for these mixed-media illustrations, which play with scale in effective ways. Bear, the mischief-maker of this tale, takes up nearly every inch of some of these spreads. And his entrance still manages to give readers a bit of a jolt, despite his appearance on the cover. On each spread where we read “it was a perfect day for …”, the illustration takes up about three-quarters of the space — with a column of white space occupying a quarter of it on the verso page. So, when Bear suddenly appears, we see him walk right through that white space on a wordless spread with Chickadee and Squirrel. He’s looking right at Squirrel’s corncob, almost oblivious to the days he's about to ruin for the smaller creatures.

You can see some of Smith’s broad paintbrush strokes on some of the animals — you want to reach out and touch them — which gives the book spontaneity and energy. Pay close attention to font color too, and you’ll see that each animal gets its own color, which is re-visited on the later spreads: The letters in “It WAS a perfect day for Dog” are in the light blue color assigned to Dog earlier, yet the “was” is bigger, bolder, and assigned the dark brown color given to Bear, the same color as his fur.

The story’s ending, as everyone stares sadly (from indoors) at Bear, is a freeze frame of an ending. It’s abrupt, but Smith communicates a great deal by having the text read “It was a perfect day for Bear,” yet showing us Squirrel, Chickadee, Cat, Dog, and Bert instead. Bear’s perfect day left them disappointed. “Perfect” doesn’t exist on its own, after all. It’s in the eye of the beholder.

Read the Horn Book Magazine review of A Perfect Day.

 

Julie Danielson

Julie Danielson

Julie Danielson writes about picture books at the blog Seven Impossible Things Before Breakfast. She also reviews for The Horn Book, Kirkus, and BookPage and is a lecturer for the School of Information Sciences graduate program at the University of Tennessee. Her book Wild Things!: Acts of Mischief in Children’s Literature, written with Betsy Bird and Peter D. Sieruta, was published in 2014.

Comment Policy:
  • Be respectful, and do not attack the author, people mentioned in the article, or other commenters. Take on the idea, not the messenger.
  • Don't use obscene, profane, or vulgar language.
  • Stay on point. Comments that stray from the topic at hand may be deleted.
  • Comments may be republished in print, online, or other forms of media.
  • If you see something objectionable, please let us know. Once a comment has been flagged, a staff member will investigate.


Brenda Martin

Let's also be fair that the font on the cover is not exactly illegible to a young person. The r and f of Perfect are the only letters that do not closely resemble what a child learning the alphabet would encounter. And even then, children at any age are going to eventually need to recognize that cursive r and flowery f as those respective letters, even if they're never to take a cursive handwriting course. I'd be really displeased if something this minor "disqualified" it from the running.

Posted : Nov 10, 2017 02:15


Susan Dailey

Jules, Thanks so much for checking about the Geisel criteria. The font inside "The Perfect Day" is readable--maybe the title font won't be a big issue. Excited to find out there is a site devoted to Geisel predictions. I will look for it. Susan

Posted : Nov 09, 2017 07:35


Julie Danielson

Susan, because I promised an answer: Amy Seto Forrester at Guessing Geisel says that, yes, the committee very much considers fonts and that emerging readers can often be thrown off by decorative fonts. She added that the ideal font is one that is clear and mimics the way that kids are learning how to write in school.

Posted : Nov 09, 2017 04:05


Jules

That is a great question, Susan. We are going to have a visit later from the women who blog at Guessing Geisel. In the meantime, I will ask them!

Posted : Nov 09, 2017 02:10


Susan Dailey

To appropriate the famous line from "Jerry Maguire," this book HAD me at the dust jacket. Not only does the bear look textured; the dust jacket HAS texture. Sumptuous! It would be a perfect day (in my opinion) if this expressive, illustration-driven book was announced as one of the winners on February 12th. As to it's chances with the Geisel committee, does anyone know if the script text of the title would be an issue for them? Does the Geisel award only consider the words and not the fonts?

Posted : Nov 09, 2017 01:27


View More Comments

RELATED 

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?

We are currently offering this content for free. Sign up now to activate your personal profile, where you can save articles for future viewing.

ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER?